Sunday, March 20, 2016

Falwell v. Piper: The Never Ending Debate

On December 5th, 2015, Liberty University President Jerry Falwell made the following comments:
“I’ve always thought if more good people had conceal-carry permits then we could end those Muslims before they walk in and kill. I just want to take this opportunity to encourage all of you to get your permit. We offer a free course. Let's teach 'em a lesson if they ever show up here.”
Various media published the quote. The predictable uproar resulted in Liberty University responding the next day with a clarifying statement:
Liberty University’s policy of allowing students, faculty, and staff to carry weapons on campus was as a result of a school shooting at Virginia Tech, about an hour from Liberty's campus.
Reverend John Piper, chancellor of Bethlehem College & Seminary responded with a post on his Desiring God blog entitled “Should Christians Be Encouraged to Arm Themselves?” When John Piper writes, many people listen -- as they should -- as Piper consistently proclaims the Gospel with eloquence, warmth, and precision.
In his blog post, Piper writes:
“I can say with complete confidence that the identification of Christian security with concealed weapons will cause no one to ask a reason for the hope that is in us. They will know perfectly well where our hope is. It’s in our back pocket.”
The post concluded:
“This article is about the people whom the Bible calls “refugees and exiles” on earth; namely, Christians. It’s about the fact that our weapons are not material, but spiritual (2 Corinthians 10:4). It is an argument that the overwhelming focus and thrust of the New Testament is that Christians are sent into the world — religious and non-religious — “as lambs in the midst of wolves” (Luke 10:3). And that exhorting the lambs to carry concealed weapons with which to shoot the wolves does not advance the counter-cultural, self-sacrificing, soul-saving cause of Christ.” (Emphasis mine)
These and other responses to recent events have caused many to adopt the superficially compelling, apparently biblical model of Christian Pacifism. Others are uneasy or uncertain about the role, utility, and morality of force, but are not sure if they can adopt a pacifist position.[1]



[1] These are complex questions without simple answers. The great tragedy of our current public discourse is the infantilization of language into bumper-sticker-ready Facebook memes.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for reading and taking the time to comment! I appreciate your comments and will review and post if appropriate.

thanks again!

The Assertion that Firearms are designed to kill

A common "talking point" circulating in the "gun control" debate is: "Firearms are designed to kill." I have s...